From pulp horror to avant garde poetics, writing that hits hard by Jedediah Smith

Tag: reviews

  • Wednesday: Periodical Review

    Title: The Cafe Irreal

    Medium: Web. They have no print component though they have produced one bound reader. Standard editorial applies: Real magazines like real newspapers appear in print, not electronic media. Print predicates quality, ethics, and reliability. Social media is fun, it’s taking over, and it may be the future, but it is now and for the forseeable future a debasing force.

    Literature Type: Fiction, exclusively of the “irreal” genre. See below for more on that.

    URL: http://cafeirreal.alicewhittenburg.com/index.htm

    Frequency: “…Irreal is a quarterly publication, publishing on February 1, May 1, August 1, and November 1 of each year.”

    Recent Issue: Most recent is Issue 90, May 2024. The website states that “we will be on hiatus until February of 2025,” so hopefully it will be back.

    Submissions: By email only, so no Submittable and no fee to submit.

    Pay: Yes: an “honorarium of one cent U.S. per word,” so way, way, way below pro. Add to this the stipulation they “will consider up to 2,000 words” and we see $20 tops is at stake, so this is not an outlet for professional writers, rather for professional students or something. Standard editorial applies: publishers who do not pay a fair rate and writers who provide work without demanding a fair rate share equal guilt in the approaching extinction of writing as a profession.

    Policies: “WE DON’T ACCEPT SIMULTANEOUS SUBMISSIONS” (sic). Considering how little market there is or this type of story, that’s not a big deal. But considering how little they pay, it’s still grating. Aside from that, the website is refreshingly free from policies about offensive content, need for social justice, and the usual woke claptrap.

    Samples:

    First, about that term irrealism. It’s been around since the 70s to describe painters as well as writers such as Donald Barthelme, Franz Kafka, John Barth, and Jorge Luis Borges. On the website it is defined thus:

    The answer to the question “What is irrealism?” can probably be answered, if not fully, then at least most concisely, by a consideration of the physical laws that underlie the objects and events depicted in the irreal story or piece of art…not only is the physics underlying the story impossible…but it is also fundamentally and essentially unpredictable (in that it is not based on any traditional or scientific conception of physics) and unexplained. In a story like “Metamorphosis” there is no physical law, even a fantastic one such as a spell or a curse, which is put forward to explain Gregor Samsa’s transformation. It is simply an absurdity that has happened, an absurdity that places itself between him and his goals in life.

    So surrealism with the use of a Freudian premise removed. Here are some sample openings from the most recent issue:

    From “Hobbesian Hideaway” by Peter Cherches

    I wanted an ice cream cone, but I didn’t understand the flavors at Ike’s Creamery. They didn’t have the standard flavors, like vanilla, chocolate, and strawberry, but they also didn’t have understandable proprietary flavors. At least Ample Hills Creamery provided ingredients for their more fanciful flavor names, like It Came from Gowanus. But I could make neither head nor tail of flavor names like Hobbesian Hideaway, Smelted Copper Fantasy, A Trip to Pluto, and Gabriel’s Kazoo.

    From “&” by Tadhg Wallace

    The & had decided Earth was worth about nine universal bucks, and the Earthlings were, by and large, receptive to this estimate.

    From “The Futility of Ideas” by Cassie Margalit

    I am a pencil—and yet you deny me my structure, spindly fibers of wood pulled together taut, a raft crashing through a storm, the raft that kills the storm—the storm is I.

    From “Spiraling” by Seth Wade

    One night I see a man chasing himself down the street; over and over he loops.

    From “Cminqe” by Tim Boiteau

    Cminqe (true pronunciation unknown) is a species of colonial organism of debatable classification once thought to be a myth until the discovery of fossil evidence of its spiny sail in the 21st century in the Cminqe Mountains.

    I’m giving this website an ink-stained thumbs up. In spite of its flaws, it has a rare virtue: stories I actually enjoy reading.

  • New Arthur Lee album in ’25

    A recent Mojo article discusses a group of songs and demos recorded in the 1990-2005 era, and that’s worth watching for. When I first saw the link on Johnny Echols’ Facebook page, the tagline was “A new LOVE album is due to drop this spring…” Alas, the always gracious and enthusiastic Mr. Echols was not fully accurate. Yes, he as the last Love original is contributing as are Baby Lemonade, the legacy backing band for both Lee’s and Echols’ recent years concerts, but this is no long-lost Love tape.

    How I wish it were. If you devoured that 60s sound of Love — really three sounds: folk-rock on album one, jazz-rock (and proto-punk) on album two, and flamenco rock on three, all united by Lee’s surreal-absurdist lyrics — as I did as a teen forty-odd years ago, then you know what it is to hunger for more. There never was anything else like it, not even Arthur’s uneven, tho sometimes brilliant, solo albums and reformed versions of Love. The only thing that came close was his “Forever Changes” tour with Baby Lemonade backing him. I saw them at the Fillmore, and it’s a treasured memory. Two years later, Arthur was gone, the voice silenced.

    But what I have really hoped for is unreleased songs by the original band.

    There was the expanded version of “Forever Changes” with two added songs. Yes! Great! More, more, more, andmoreagain! Then came the box set with remixes, remasters, stereo, and mono versions, but no rediscovered songs. Meh.

    I’m not interested in engineers’ various approaches to their songs. I want a new Echols solo, I want more Tjay Cantrelli sax screeching and winding around the Lee and MacLean wall of rhythm guitar. And Snoopy’s baroque harpsichord backing new psychedelic word paintings. None of that? Major disappointment.

    I know, the cupboard may be bare, end of Love story. Still, I dream of this: the five songs originally slated for side 2 of “Da Capo” before they decided to go with a groundbreaking side-long song with “Revelation.” Bryan said in an interview that he wished they had gone in that direction. Did they put any of it on tape? Maybe not. More songs from the solo album would be welcome, things too crazy and out-of-control to be acceptable to Elektra brass. How about some post-“Forever Changes” session work before Arthur split the band for some new backers on “Four Sale.”

    This new release appears to be nothing of the sort. Will I still get it? Of course, and I’ll hope for some great Arthur Lee songwriting even if they band that first brought his tunes to life in 65-67 has already given us all they have to give.